Sony SLT A57 vs Sony SLT A58

Winner
Sony SLT A57

114

Sony SLT A58

100

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A57

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 60fps
Large screen
Screen size
3"
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.72x
 

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A58

True resolution
High true resolution
20.1 MP
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
0.65x
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT A57.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT A58.

competitors

Sony SLT A57 Competitors

Sony SLT A35

Sony SLT A35

Entry-level DSLR

Size Smaller
Weight Significantly lighter
Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$749 body only

$700 - $849 with 16-50mm lens

Focus points Many more focus points
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$918 body only

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Much smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower

Sony SLT A58 Competitors

Sony SLT-A65

Sony SLT A65

Entry-level DSLR

$866 with 18-55mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Much larger screen
Battery life Shorter battery life
Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$319 body only

$393 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Much larger screen
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350

Super zoom

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
True resolution Much lower true resolution

discussion

Sony SLT A57
SLT A57
Sony

Report a correction
Sony SLT A58
SLT A58
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 8 comments

Avatar for tinslatee tinslatee (1:57 AM, December 27, 2013)
any camera that claims to be a dslr/slt and has a plastic lens mount should be thrown in the dust bin of history and erased from our memory. The whole concept of interchangeable lenses is based on this connection being secure and durable, They have taken one of the most important moving parts of this style of camera and butchered it. Enough said.
 
Angie (3:51 PM, November 13, 2013)
At least three of the reasons given for buying the a58 also apply to the a57. I don't know about the video one since I don't use the a57 for video.
 
Avatar for Low_Budget_Dave Low_Budget_Dave (11:33 AM, October 27, 2013)
In general use, I prefer the A58 to the A57. The comparison above surprised me. The newer sensor produces results that are visibly better to me, without even bothering to peek at pixels. This might be due to different programming, and a good round of photoshop might make them look the same, but for out-of-camera jpg, I like the A58 better.


The rear screen on the A58 is not as good, but most people will not notice. The viewfinder on the A58 is not as good either. Most people will notice this, but it still might not bother you. The plastic lens mount on the A58 might bother people, but as long as you are careful, it won't make any difference.


To me, the Autofocus matters much more than the rear screen, and the A58 feels faster. I don't know if it is or not, but if you put the same lens on them in the store, and try them both out, you will most likely buy the A58.
 
Bob Cox (9:05 PM, July 03, 2013)
Contrary to what this page says, both the A57 and A58 have sensor-shift stabilization built into the body. Both are capable of supporting lens with in-lens stabilizers, but neither one requires them.
 
Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (5:15 PM, June 10, 2013)
Thanks for pointing that out @davebytes:disqus , we we will fix that up soon
 
Avatar for davebytes davebytes (4:46 PM, June 10, 2013)
Your weight data is wrong. You transposed the weight for A58 (should be 492, not 429), and used the batt+media weight for the A57 (rather than batt-less data, which is 539). Apples to apples, 492 vs 539 is just under 10%, which at the 500g mark, PLUS battery, media, and LENS, isn't much of a delta.
 
Avatar for Cinekpol Cinekpol (8:38 AM, May 10, 2013)
Lol, this comparison is totally dumb. A58 looses even though it "Distinguishes 729,6 more bits of color" - seriously? If in reality it'd have 729,6 more bits of color resolution than A57 - which it doesn't - for this feature alone it'd be an insta-buy of A58. But no... not according to snapsort.... sure... lol
 
dragunr1 (8:41 AM, May 04, 2013)
wrong entry for a58, appears in other comparisons too: 753 bits
vs
23,4 bits

Distinguishes 729,6 more bits of color