Sony SLT A57 vs Sony SLT A58

Winner
Sony SLT A57

70

Sony SLT A58

61

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A57

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 60fps
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
13 EV
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.72x
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
12 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A58

Battery life
Great battery life
690 shots
Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
0.65x
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
Sensor shift
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
8 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT A57. Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT A58.

differences

Advantages of the Sony SLT A57

Report a correction
3D
Takes 3D photos
Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Movie format
Lower frame rate movies
1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
Help
Both shoot Full HD (1080p) video, but SLT A57 does so at a higher frame rate
Screen size
Much larger screen
3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Screen resolution
Much higher resolution screen
921k dots vs 460k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting
Shoots much faster
12 fps vs 8 fps
Help
50% faster continuous shooting
Viewfinder size
Significantly larger viewfinder
0.72x vs 0.65x
Help
More than 20% larger viewfinder
Screen flips out
Has a flip-out screen
Yes vs No
Help
Flip-out screens can be helpful when composing tricky shots or taking movies
Dynamic range
More dynamic range
13 EV vs 12.5 EV
Help
0.5 f-stops more dynamic range
Low light performance
Slightly lower noise at high ISO
785 ISO vs 753 ISO
Help
Almost the same
Overall image quality
Slightly better image quality
75.0 vs 74.0
Help
Almost the same
Sony SLT A57 Learn more about
the Sony SLT A57

Advantages of the Sony SLT A58

Report a correction
True resolution
Higher true resolution
20.1 MP vs 16 MP
Help
Capture around 30% more detail in your photos
Battery life
Longer battery life
690 shots vs 550 shots
Help
Around 30% more shots per battery charge
Size
Smaller
129x95x78 mm vs 132x98x81 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller
Weight
Lighter
492 g vs 618 g
Help
More than 20% lighter
Thickness
Thinner
3.1" vs 3.2"
Help
Almost the same
Lowest price
Cheaper
$444.69 vs $607.92
Help
The best price we've seen is $163 cheaper (around 30% less)
Sony SLT A58 Learn more about
the Sony SLT A58
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent entry-level DSLRs, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Sony SLT A57 Sony SLT A57 70
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save
        vs
        61 Sony SLT A58 Sony SLT A58
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent entry-level DSLRs

              Common Strengths
              Autofocus Both use faster phase detection video autofocus which is uncommon Help
              fast and accurate
              Viewfinder size Large viewfinder size Help
              SLT A570.72x
              SLT A580.65x
              Panorama Both have in-camera panoramic stitching, many cameras like these don't Help
              Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
              Continuous shooting Very fast continuous shooting Help
              SLT A5712 fps
              SLT A588 fps
              Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
              Sensor shift
              Movie continuous focus Focus continuously recording movies Help
              Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
              External mic jack Have external mic jacks Help
              Record higher quality audio with a microphone
              Viewfinder coverage Above average viewfinder coverage Help
              100%
              Common Weaknesses
              Fastest shutter speed Slow max shutter speed Help
              1/4000 of a second
              Thickness Quite thick Help
              SLT A573.2"
              SLT A583.1"
              Viewfinder Both have digital viewfinders Help
              Digital
              Storage slots Fewer storage slots Help
              1
              Lens availability Few lenses available Help
              123 lenses
              Cross type focus points Few cross-type focus points Help
              3
              Weather sealed Neither is weather sealed Help
              Need to shelter it from weather
              Touch screen No touchscreens Help
              More buttons
              Low light performance Above average noise at high ISO Help
              SLT A57785 ISO
              SLT A58753 ISO

              dxomark

              DXOMark

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Nikon D3200

              Nikon D3200

              Entry-level DSLR

              $279 - $557 body only

              $349 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

              Low light performance Is significantly less noisy at high ISO
              Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
              Light sensitivity (boost) Slightly lower boost light sensitivity
              Viewfinder coverage Significantly less viewfinder coverage
              Nikon D3300

              Nikon D3300

              Entry-level DSLR

              $420 - $497 with 18-55mm lens

              Low light performance Is much less noisy at high ISO
              Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
              Viewfinder coverage Significantly less viewfinder coverage
              HDR Lacks a built-in HDR feature
              Canon Rebel T5i

              Canon Rebel T5i

              Entry-level DSLR

              $649 - $650 body only

              $620 - $700 with 18-55mm lens

              Screen resolution Has a slightly higher resolution screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Nikon D5200

              Nikon D5200

              Entry-level DSLR

              $497 - $547 body only

              $499 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

              Low light performance Is significantly less noisy at high ISO
              Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Viewfinder coverage Significantly less viewfinder coverage
              Canon Rebel T3i

              Canon Rebel T3i

              Entry-level DSLR

              $612 with 75-300mm lens

              Screen resolution Has a slightly higher resolution screen
              Startup delay Has slightly less startup delay
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Light sensitivity (boost) Slightly lower boost light sensitivity
              Nikon D5300

              Nikon D5300

              Entry-level DSLR

              $647 - $697 body only

              $579 - $797 with 18-55mm lens

              Low light performance Is much less noisy at high ISO
              Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Viewfinder coverage Significantly less viewfinder coverage
              Sony SLT-A65

              Sony SLT A65

              Entry-level DSLR

              $588 with 18-55mm lens

              True resolution Takes slightly higher resolution photos
              Shutter lag Has much less shutter lag
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker

              Sony SLT A57 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              No significant competitors found that are specific to the Sony SLT A57.

              Sony SLT A58 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon EOS Rebel T5

              Canon EOS Rebel T5

              Entry-level DSLR

              $499 body only

              $399 - $400 with 18-55mm lens

              Screen size Much larger screen
              Viewfinder Has an optical viewfinder
              Dynamic range Less dynamic range
              Overall image quality Significantly worse image quality

              appearance

              Sony SLT A57 Sony SLT A58
              Sony SLT A57 Sony SLT A58

              discussion

              Sony SLT A57
              SLT A57
              Sony

              Report a correction
              Sony SLT A58
              SLT A58
              Sony

              Report a correction

              Showing 8 comments

              Avatar for tinslatee tinslatee (1:57 AM, December 27, 2013)
              any camera that claims to be a dslr/slt and has a plastic lens mount should be thrown in the dust bin of history and erased from our memory. The whole concept of interchangeable lenses is based on this connection being secure and durable, They have taken one of the most important moving parts of this style of camera and butchered it. Enough said.
               
              Angie (3:51 PM, November 13, 2013)
              At least three of the reasons given for buying the a58 also apply to the a57. I don't know about the video one since I don't use the a57 for video.
               
              Avatar for Low_Budget_Dave Low_Budget_Dave (11:33 AM, October 27, 2013)
              In general use, I prefer the A58 to the A57. The comparison above surprised me. The newer sensor produces results that are visibly better to me, without even bothering to peek at pixels. This might be due to different programming, and a good round of photoshop might make them look the same, but for out-of-camera jpg, I like the A58 better.


              The rear screen on the A58 is not as good, but most people will not notice. The viewfinder on the A58 is not as good either. Most people will notice this, but it still might not bother you. The plastic lens mount on the A58 might bother people, but as long as you are careful, it won't make any difference.


              To me, the Autofocus matters much more than the rear screen, and the A58 feels faster. I don't know if it is or not, but if you put the same lens on them in the store, and try them both out, you will most likely buy the A58.
               
              Bob Cox (9:05 PM, July 03, 2013)
              Contrary to what this page says, both the A57 and A58 have sensor-shift stabilization built into the body. Both are capable of supporting lens with in-lens stabilizers, but neither one requires them.
               
              Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (5:15 PM, June 10, 2013)
              Thanks for pointing that out @davebytes:disqus , we we will fix that up soon
               
              Avatar for davebytes davebytes (4:46 PM, June 10, 2013)
              Your weight data is wrong. You transposed the weight for A58 (should be 492, not 429), and used the batt+media weight for the A57 (rather than batt-less data, which is 539). Apples to apples, 492 vs 539 is just under 10%, which at the 500g mark, PLUS battery, media, and LENS, isn't much of a delta.
               
              Avatar for Cinekpol Cinekpol (8:38 AM, May 10, 2013)
              Lol, this comparison is totally dumb. A58 looses even though it "Distinguishes 729,6 more bits of color" - seriously? If in reality it'd have 729,6 more bits of color resolution than A57 - which it doesn't - for this feature alone it'd be an insta-buy of A58. But no... not according to snapsort.... sure... lol
               
              dragunr1 (8:41 AM, May 04, 2013)
              wrong entry for a58, appears in other comparisons too: 753 bits
              vs
              23,4 bits

              Distinguishes 729,6 more bits of color