Updated (April 2012): Compare the Sony NEX-5N vs Sony NEX F3

Sony NEX 5N vs Sony NEX F3

Winner
Sony NEX-5N

74

Sony NEX F3

66

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony NEX 5N

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
235 ms shutter lag
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Sony NEX F3

Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony NEX-5N.

competitors

Sony NEX-5N Competitors

Sony NEX 5R

Sony NEX 5R

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$762 body only

Focus points More focus points
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Low light performance More noise at high ISO
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$398 body only

$548 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$446 body only

$348 with 16-50mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen

Sony NEX F3 Competitors

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$450 body only

Shutter lag Less shutter lag
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Sony Alpha NEX-5

Sony Alpha NEX-5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$390 body only

$481 with 16-50mm lens

Startup delay Significantly less startup delay
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Low light performance More noise at high ISO
Sony NEX C3

Sony NEX C3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$322 body only

$444 with 18-55mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Startup delay Less startup delay
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Sony NEX-5N
NEX 5N
Sony

Report a correction
Sony NEX F3
NEX F3
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments