Updated (January, 2012): Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.6
Light sensitivity
High ISO
12,800 ISO
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100v

Screen size
Large screen
3.5"
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,229k dots
Touch screen
Touch screen
Less buttons
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Sony DSC-TX100v

Report a correction
Screen size Much larger screen 3.5" vs 2.7"
Help
Around 30% larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
Help
More than 2.5x higher resolution screen
Screen type Has an OLED screen OLED vs LCD
Help
OLED screens are often brighter and more vibrant than typical LCD screens
Touch screen Has a touch screen Yes vs No
Help
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus
GPS Has a GPS Yes vs No
Help
Automatically geotags your photos when traveling
Thickness Slightly thinner 0.7" vs 0.7"
Help
Around 10% thinner
Sony Cybershot DSC-TX100V Learn more about
the Sony DSC-TX100v

Advantages of the Sony WX50

Report a correction
Aperture Significantly wider aperture f/2.6 vs f/3.5
Help
At its widest zoom, the WX50's lens captures slightly more light (0.9 f-stops)
3D Takes 3D photos Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The WX50's maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
HDR Has in-camera HDR Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range
Wide angle Better wide angle 25 mm vs 27 mm
Help
Around 10% better wide angle
Size Slightly smaller 92x52x19 mm vs 96x58x17 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller
Weight Lighter 117 g vs 147 g
Help
More than 20% lighter
Lowest price Cheaper $138.12 vs $259.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $121 cheaper (around 50% less)
Longest exposure Slightly longer exposures 4s vs 2s
Help
2x longer exposures
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 Learn more about
the Sony WX50
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX100V Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100v 66
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        67 Sony Cyber-shot WX50 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Size Fairly small Help
              DSC-TX100v:96x58x17 mm
              WX50:92x52x19 mm
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Thickness Thin Help
              0.7"
              Weight Light weight Help
              DSC-TX100v:147 g
              WX50:117 g
              Longest exposure Short max exposure time Help
              DSC-TX100v:2s
              WX50:4s
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity
              Macro focus Poor macro capabilities Help
              5 cm
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              DSC-TX100v:4x
              WX50:5x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

              Travel zoom

              $278 - $288

              Zoom Has much more zoom
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

              Travel zoom

              $215 - $328

              Zoom Has much more zoom
              Battery life Has a much longer battery life
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

              Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

              Pro digicam

              $498

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              True resolution Takes much higher resolution photos
              Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker

              Sony Cybershot DSC-TX100V Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10

              Sony Cybershot TX10

              Waterproof

              $258 - $279

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Screen size Significantly smaller screen
              Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

              Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

              Ultra compact

              $328 - $540

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
              GPS No built-in GPS
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

              Waterproof

              $198 - $214

              Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
              HDR Has in-camera HDR
              GPS No built-in GPS
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V

              Waterproof

              $290

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Lowest price Slightly more expensive
              Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

              Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

              Ultra compact

              $266 - $360

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Macro focus Much worse macro capability

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Travel zoom

              $148

              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

              Ultra compact

              $100 - $170

              Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Sony Cybershot WX60

              Sony Cybershot WX60

              Travel zoom

              $215

              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

              Travel zoom

              $108 - $138

              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Lowest price Slightly cheaper
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150

              Travel zoom

              $183

              Screen size Larger screen
              Zoom More zoom
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Size Larger

              appearance

              Sony Cybershot DSC-TX100V Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
              Sony Cybershot DSC-TX100V Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
              Sony Cybershot DSC-TX100V Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

              discussion

              Sony Cybershot DSC-TX100V
              Cyber-shot DSC-TX100v
              Sony

              Report a correction
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
              Cyber-shot WX50
              Sony

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments