Updated (June 2012): Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs Sony NEX F3

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs Sony NEX F3

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

83

Sony NEX F3

43

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Great color depth
Color depth
22.6 bits
 

Reasons to buy the Sony NEX F3

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
1500 ms startup delay
Color depth
Great color depth
22.7 bits
Low light performance
Low noise at high ISO
1,114 ISO

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Wide angle Better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$429

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Color depth Worse color depth
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 body only

$348 with 16-50mm lens

Overall image quality Better image quality
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Sony NEX F3 Competitors

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$450 body only

Size Slightly smaller
Shutter lag Slightly less shutter lag
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX 5N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$354 body only

$887 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Overall image quality Better image quality
Startup delay More startup delay
Sony Alpha NEX-5

Sony Alpha NEX-5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$390 body only

$481 with 16-50mm lens

Startup delay Less startup delay
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Shutter lag Much more shutter lag

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
Cybershot DSC-RX100
Sony

Report a correction
Sony NEX F3
NEX F3
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments