Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

Winner
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R

93

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

77

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Great image quality
Overall image quality
91.0
Really small
Size
Standard size (113×65×70 mm)
High true resolution
True resolution
24 MP
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Supports RAW
Shoots RAW
Better editing

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10.
Explore our gallery of 39 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R.

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R Competitors

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F

Boutique

$1,299

Focus points Many more focus points
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Sensor size Significantly smaller sensor
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1

Boutique

$2,798

Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Viewfinder No viewfinder
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II

Boutique

$3,898

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Focus points Many more focus points
Built-in flash No built-in flash

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Super zoom

$1,398

Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Pro digicam

$698 - $798

Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Size Significantly larger
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Pro digicam

$748 - $749

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R
Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments