Sony Cybershot WX10 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10

55

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

41

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot WX10

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.4
Really small
Size
Super compact (95×54×23 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
Light-weight
Weight
161 g
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Light sensitivity
High ISO
12,800 ISO
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Size
Really small
Compact (107×62×35 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500

Travel zoom

$348 - $386

Zoom Much more zoom
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220

Travel zoom

$198 - $218

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Size Slightly smaller
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150

Travel zoom

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Travel zoom

$547

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Travel zoom

$310

Size Much smaller
Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Canon Rebel SL1

Canon Rebel SL1

Entry-level DSLR

$473 - $549 body only

$443 - $499 with 18-55mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Much larger

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10
Cybershot WX10
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments