Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V

Tie
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

64

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V

64

Tie

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
Really small
Size
Compact (107×62×35 mm)
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Thin
Thickness
1.4"
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V

GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Size
Really small
Compact (107×62×35 mm)
Light sensitivity
High ISO
12,800 ISO
Thickness
Thin
1.4"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V.

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Travel zoom

$607

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Aperture Narrower aperture
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Travel zoom

Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Smaller
Zoom Less zoom

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350

Super zoom

$449 - $555

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Much larger
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Aperture Narrower aperture
Samsung Galaxy Camera

Samsung Galaxy Camera

Travel zoom

$85

Screen size Much larger screen
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 3 comments

dino (8:55 PM, January 13, 2013)
Your specs are incomplete: Advantages of the Sony DSC-HX30V vs Sony DSC-HX20V:
Wi-Fi!
 
Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (5:56 PM, March 13, 2012)
Thanks for pointing that out Alvaro, we will fix that up soon.
 
Alvaro P. (5:46 PM, March 13, 2012)
Your specs are wrong, the macro is 1cm, not 10cm