Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V

Tie
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

60

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V

60

Tie

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Great macro
Macro focus
1.0 cm
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V

GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Light sensitivity
High ISO
12,800 ISO
Macro focus
Great macro
1.0 cm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V.

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$389 - $428

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Aperture Narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Travel zoom

$499

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$329

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
GPS No built-in GPS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$389 - $428

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Aperture Narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Travel zoom

$499

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Travel zoom

$275

Size Much smaller
Battery life Much longer battery life
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX30V
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 3 comments

dino (8:55 PM, January 13, 2013)
Your specs are incomplete: Advantages of the Sony DSC-HX30V vs Sony DSC-HX20V:
Wi-Fi!
 
Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (5:56 PM, March 13, 2012)
Thanks for pointing that out Alvaro, we will fix that up soon.
 
Alvaro P. (5:46 PM, March 13, 2012)
Your specs are wrong, the macro is 1cm, not 10cm