Updated (June 2012): Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V vs Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

100

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

55

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
High true resolution
True resolution
20 MP
Large sensor
Sensor size
1" 13.2x8.8mm
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Battery life
Great battery life
450 shots
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Tunnel
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 Competitors

Placeholder

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Travel zoom

$399

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Wide angle Much better wide angle
GPS Has a GPS
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Travel zoom

$529

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Aperture Much narrower aperture

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Super zoom

$398

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

Super zoom

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Travel zoom

$791

Size Smaller
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Much shorter battery life

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
Cybershot DSC-RX100
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments