Sony Alpha a7R III vs Sony Alpha a9

Placeholder
Placeholder

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha a7R III

High true resolution
True resolution
42.2 MP
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,440k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha a9

Light sensitivity
High ISO
204,800 ISO
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
20 fps
Focus points
Many focus points
693
Size
Really small
Prosumer size (127×96×63 mm)

competitors

Sony Alpha a7R III Competitors

Placeholder

Sony Alpha a7 III

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,998 - $2,303 body only

$2,198 - $2,810 with 28-70mm lens

Focus points Significantly more focus points
Battery life Longer battery life
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$799 - $899 body only

$900 - $999 with 16-50mm lens

GPS Has a GPS
Size Significantly smaller
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$2,595 - $3,099 body only

$3,229 - $3,999 with 24-105mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Lens availability Much more lenses available
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Sony Alpha a9 Competitors

Placeholder

Sony Alpha a7 III

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,998 - $2,303 body only

$2,198 - $2,810 with 28-70mm lens

Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Significantly cheaper
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Pro DSLR

$4,863 - $5,499 body only

$6,198 with 16-35mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,419 - $1,697 body only

$2,197 with 24-120mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Built-in focus motor Has a built-in focus motor
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Placeholder
Alpha a7R III
Sony

Report a correction
Placeholder
Alpha a9
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments