Sony Alpha a7 III vs Sony Alpha a6500

Placeholder
Sony Alpha a6500

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha a7 III

Shoots UHD movies
Movie format
UHD @ 30fps
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.78x
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
Great battery life
Battery life
710 shots
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha a6500

Size
Really small
Mid size (120×67×53 mm)
Thickness
Thin
2.1"
Weight
Light-weight
453 g
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed

competitors

Sony Alpha a7 III Competitors

Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,499 body only

$1,899 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Placeholder

Canon EOS R

Boutique

$2,299

Focus points Many more focus points
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Placeholder

Sony Alpha a7R III

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$2,898 - $3,298 body only

$3,400 with 28-70mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Focus points Significantly fewer focus points

Sony Alpha a6500 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$696 - $898 body only

$795 - $998 with 16-50mm lens

Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Battery life Longer battery life
Touch screen No touch screen
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$400 - $448 body only

$470 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen
Sony Alpha 7 II

Sony Alpha 7 II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,110 - $1,398 body only

$1,299 - $1,598 with 28-70mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen

discussion

Placeholder
Alpha a7 III
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Alpha a6500
Alpha a6500
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments