Sony Alpha A6000 vs Sony SLT A58

Winner
Sony Alpha A6000

96

Sony SLT A58

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A6000

Great image quality
Overall image quality
82.0
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Great color depth
Color depth
24.1 bits
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.70x
 

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A58

Lens availability
Slightly more lenses available
126 lenses
Badge
Phase detection autofocus
fast and accurate
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT A58.

competitors

Sony Alpha A6000 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$794 - $828 body only

$910 - $928 with 16-50mm lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,398 body only

$1,498 - $1,499 with 16-50mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$398 body only

$498 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Sony SLT A58 Competitors

Sony SLT-A68

Sony SLT-A68

Boutique

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Focus points More focus points
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Sony SLT A57

Sony SLT A57

Entry-level DSLR

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
True resolution Lower true resolution
Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$370 body only

$394 - $497 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Built-in focus motor Has a built-in focus motor
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage

discussion

Sony Alpha A6000
Alpha A6000
Sony

Report a correction
Sony SLT A58
SLT A58
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments