Sony Alpha A6000 vs Sony Alpha A5000

Winner
Sony Alpha A6000

100

Sony Alpha A5000

67

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A6000

Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.70x
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
High true resolution
True resolution
24 MP
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A5000

Size
Really small
Compact (110×63×36 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.4"
Weight
Light-weight
210 g
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

competitors

Sony Alpha A6000 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$748 - $828 body only

$848 - $928 with 16-50mm lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,198 - $1,398 body only

$1,298 - $1,499 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Fujifilm X-A3

Fujifilm X-A3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$443 body only

$549 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Viewfinder No viewfinder

Sony Alpha A5000 Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$499 with 15-45mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$398 body only

$448 - $498 with 16-50mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Battery life Shorter battery life
Fujifilm X-A10

Fujifilm X-A10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$349 with 16-50mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
True resolution Lower true resolution

discussion

Sony Alpha A6000
Alpha A6000
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Alpha A5000
Alpha A5000
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments