Sony Alpha A6000 vs Sony Alpha A5000

Winner
Sony Alpha A6000

100

Sony Alpha A5000

70

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A6000

Great image quality
Overall image quality
82.0
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.70x
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A5000

Weight
Light-weight
210 g
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Battery life
Great battery life
420 shots

competitors

Sony Alpha A6000 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$898 body only

$1,048 with 16-50mm lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$448 body only

$598 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,398 body only

$1,580 with 55-210mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Sony Alpha A5000 Competitors

Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$448 body only

$598 with 16-50mm lens

Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Battery life Shorter battery life
Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Low light performance Significantly more noise at high ISO
Nikon 1 J5

Nikon 1 J5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$380 - $497 with 10-30mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Low light performance Much more noise at high ISO

discussion

Sony Alpha A6000
Alpha A6000
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Alpha A5000
Alpha A5000
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments