Sony Alpha A5100 vs Sony Alpha A5000

Winner
Sony Alpha A5100

100

Sony Alpha A5000

88

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A5100

High true resolution
True resolution
24.7 MP
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Phase detection autofocus
Badge
fast and accurate
Many focus points
Focus points
179
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A5000

Weight
Light-weight
210 g
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from

competitors

Sony Alpha A5100 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$442 - $498 body only

$598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $580 with 15-45mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Fujifilm X-A3

Fujifilm X-A3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$599 with 16-50mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Autofocus Slower autofocus

Sony Alpha A5000 Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $580 with 15-45mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$442 - $498 body only

$598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Nikon 1 J5

Nikon 1 J5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$349 - $497 with 10-30mm lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Sony Alpha A5100
Alpha A5100
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Alpha A5000
Alpha A5000
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments