Sony Alpha A5100 vs Sony Alpha A5000

Winner
Sony Alpha A5100

100

Sony Alpha A5000

86

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A5100

High true resolution
True resolution
24.7 MP
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Phase detection autofocus
Badge
fast and accurate
Many focus points
Focus points
179
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A5000

Weight
Light-weight
210 g
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Size
Really small
Compact (110×63×36 mm)

competitors

Sony Alpha A5100 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$444 - $448 body only

$500 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$439 with 15-45mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$305 - $649 body only

$343 - $449 with 18-55mm lens

Lens availability Much more lenses available
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Sony Alpha A5000 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$444 - $448 body only

$500 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$439 with 15-45mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$548 - $679

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only

discussion

Sony Alpha A5100
Alpha A5100
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Alpha A5000
Alpha A5000
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments