Sony A7R vs Sony Alpha a7 III

Sony A7R
Placeholder

Reasons to buy the Sony A7R

High true resolution
True resolution
36.2 MP
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Really small
Size
Standard size (127×94×48 mm)
Thin
Thickness
1.9"
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha a7 III

Movie format
Shoots UHD movies
UHD @ 30fps
Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
0.78x
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift

competitors

Sony A7R Competitors

Sony A7

Sony A7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$749 - $798 body only

$998 with 28-70mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Focus points More focus points
True resolution Much lower true resolution
Sony A7S

Sony A7S

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,993 - $1,998 body only

$2,798 with 28-70mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
True resolution Much lower true resolution
Sony Alpha 7 II

Sony Alpha 7 II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,110 - $1,398 body only

$1,299 - $1,598 with 28-70mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
True resolution Much lower true resolution

Sony Alpha a7 III Competitors

Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,499 body only

$1,899 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Placeholder

Canon EOS R

Boutique

$2,299

Focus points Many more focus points
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Placeholder

Sony Alpha a7R III

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$2,898 - $3,298 body only

$3,400 with 28-70mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Focus points Significantly fewer focus points

discussion

Sony A7R
A7R
Sony

Report a correction
Placeholder
Alpha a7 III
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments