Sony Alpha A6000 vs Sony A7R

Winner
Sony Alpha A6000

97

Sony A7R

95

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A6000

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Many focus points
Focus points
179
High ISO (boost)
Light sensitivity (boost)
51,200 ISO
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.70x
 

Reasons to buy the Sony A7R

Low light performance
Low noise at high ISO
2,746 ISO
Overall image quality
Great image quality
95.0
Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
0.71x
Color depth
Great color depth
26 bits

competitors

Sony Alpha A6000 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$998 body only

$1,148 with 16-50mm lens

Focus points Many more focus points
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$348 body only

$498 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony A7

Sony A7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$998 - $3,198 body only

$1,298 with 28-70mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Autofocus Faster video autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Sony A7R Competitors

Sony Alpha 7 II

Sony Alpha 7 II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,400 - $1,498 body only

$1,685 - $1,798 with 28-70mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Autofocus Faster autofocus
True resolution Significantly lower true resolution
Sony A7

Sony A7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$998 - $3,198 body only

$1,298 with 28-70mm lens

Autofocus Faster video autofocus
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Low light performance More noise at high ISO
Sony A7S

Sony A7S

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,849 - $2,198 body only

$2,014 with 28-70mm lens

Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
True resolution Much lower true resolution

discussion

Sony Alpha A6000
Alpha A6000
Sony

Report a correction
Sony A7R
A7R
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments