Sony SLT A77 vs Sony SLT A58

Winner
Sony SLT-A77

100

Sony SLT A58

76

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A77

Great image quality
Overall image quality
78.0
Great color depth
Color depth
24 bits
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
13.2 EV
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.72x
 

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A58

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT-A77.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT A58.

competitors

Sony SLT-A77 Competitors

Sony SLT A77 II

Sony SLT A77 II

Pro DSLR

$1,198 body only

$1,798 with 16-50mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Focus points More focus points
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$444 - $498 body only

$500 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Autofocus Slower autofocus
Sony SLT-A65

Sony SLT A65

Entry-level DSLR

$821 with 18-55mm lens

Size Smaller
Lowest price Cheaper
Weather sealed No weather sealing

Sony SLT A58 Competitors

Sony SLT A57

Sony SLT A57

Entry-level DSLR

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
True resolution Lower true resolution
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$400 body only

$500 - $515 with 18-55mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Screen size Much larger screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$444 - $498 body only

$500 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Autofocus Slower autofocus

discussion

Sony SLT-A77
SLT A77
Sony

Report a correction
Sony SLT A58
SLT A58
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments