Updated (June 2012): Compare the Sony SLT-A77 vs Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs Sony SLT A77

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

73

Sony SLT-A77

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A77

Overall image quality
Great image quality
78.0
True resolution
High true resolution
24 MP
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT-A77.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Wide angle Better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$428 - $449

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Color depth Worse color depth
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Pro digicam

$648

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Weight Slightly heavier

Sony SLT-A77 Competitors

Sony SLT A77 II

Sony SLT A77 II

Pro DSLR

$1,198 body only

$1,798 with 16-50mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Overall image quality Better image quality
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Canon EOS 70D

Canon EOS 70D

Pro DSLR

$812 - $999 body only

$913 - $1,099 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon D7100

Nikon D7100

Entry-level DSLR

$650 - $697 body only

$997 with 18-140mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
Cybershot DSC-RX100
Sony

Report a correction
Sony SLT-A77
SLT A77
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments