Sony A7 vs Sony Alpha a6300

Sony A7
Sony Alpha a6300

Reasons to buy the Sony A7

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
221 ms shutter lag
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha a6300

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
11 fps
Badge
Phase detection autofocus
fast and accurate
Focus points
Many focus points
425

competitors

Sony A7 Competitors

Placeholder

Sony Alpha a7 III

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,898 - $1,998 body only

$2,098 - $2,230 with 28-70mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,265 - $1,697 body only

$1,821 - $2,197 with 24-120mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Significantly larger
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$428 - $448 body only

$518 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

Sony Alpha a6300 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,098 body only

$1,498 with 18-135mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$499 - $500 body only

$599 - $600 with 15-45mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$428 - $448 body only

$518 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

Weight Lighter
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Weather sealed No weather sealing

discussion

Sony A7
A7
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Alpha a6300
Alpha a6300
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments