Sony A7 vs Sony Alpha A6000
|
Mirrorless interchangeable-lens
$1,399 body only
$1,699 with 18-55mm lens
![]() | Has a touch screen |
![]() | Faster autofocus |
![]() | Lower resolution screen |
Mirrorless interchangeable-lens
$1,698 with 24-70mm lens
![]() | Image stabilization |
![]() | Faster autofocus |
![]() | Larger |
Mirrorless interchangeable-lens
![]() | Image stabilization |
![]() | Has a touch screen |
![]() | No weather sealing |
Boutique
$4,995
![]() | Has a touch screen |
![]() | Much higher true resolution |
![]() | Screen does not flip out |
Mirrorless interchangeable-lens
$363 - $448 body only
$450 - $548 with 16-50mm lens
![]() | Has a touch screen |
![]() | Faster autofocus |
![]() | No image stabilization |
Mirrorless interchangeable-lens
![]() | Has a touch screen |
![]() | Faster autofocus |
![]() | Significantly fewer lenses available |
Showing 7 comments
One completely non-technical distinct advantage the a6000 has is it is newer. Digital photography is advancing so fast that there are APS-C sensor camera's that perform much better than older full frame cameras. My question is that the a7 was the state of the art back in 2013, while the a6000 is a 2015 camera. Is a mere two years enough for it to be almost as good as a two year old full frame - at least enough that the additional cost/bulk of a full frame is no-longer worth it?
That's what I'm trying to figure out.
Also, I just shot a swell movie. NO SOUND. Does the A 6000 need an external mic as well? There is much to like about this camera, but
I am concerned with these two shortcomings.