Sony A7 vs Sony Alpha 7R II

Sony A7
Sony Alpha 7R II

Reasons to buy the Sony A7

Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Really small
Size
Standard size (127×94×48 mm)
Thin
Thickness
1.9"
Light-weight
Weight
417 g
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha 7R II

Movie format
Shoots UHD movies
UHD @ 30fps
Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
0.78x
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
True resolution
High true resolution
42.2 MP

competitors

Sony A7 Competitors

Sony Alpha 7 II

Sony Alpha 7 II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,370 - $1,498 body only

$1,580 - $1,798 with 28-70mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Size Larger
Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$948 - $998 body only

$1,091 - $1,148 with 16-50mm lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Focus points Many more focus points
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$548 body only

$626 - $648 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Low light performance Much more noise at high ISO

Sony Alpha 7R II Competitors

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$3,499 body only

$4,299 - $4,599 with 24-105mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen size Much larger screen
Focus points Many fewer focus points
Sony Alpha 7S II

Sony Alpha 7S II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$2,698 body only

$3,200 with 28-70mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
True resolution Much lower true resolution
Sony Alpha 7 II

Sony Alpha 7 II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,370 - $1,498 body only

$1,580 - $1,798 with 28-70mm lens

Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Cheaper
Movie format Lower resolution movies

discussion

Sony A7
A7
Sony

Report a correction
Sony Alpha 7R II
Alpha 7R II
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments