Updated (September 2011): Compare the Samsung WB750 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Samsung WB750 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Tie
Samsung WB750

50

Nikon Coolpix S9100

49

Tie

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB750

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (105×59×25 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
440 fps
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

Size
Really small
Compact (105×62×35 mm)
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Thickness
Thin
1.4"
Weight
Light-weight
214 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 6 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB750.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Samsung WB750 Competitors

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$166

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Samsung WB850F

Samsung WB850F

Travel zoom

$230

GPS Has a GPS
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Battery life Shorter battery life
Samsung WB700

Samsung WB700

Travel zoom

Size Smaller
Macro focus Better macro capability
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$998 body only

$1,148 with 16-50mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
True resolution Much higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$123 - $197

Size Significantly smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$249

Zoom Much more zoom
GPS Has a GPS
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Samsung WB750
WB750
Samsung

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments