Updated (February, 2012): Compare the Samsung WB850F vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Samsung WB750

Tie
Samsung WB750

59

vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB750

Size
Really small
Compact 105x59x24 mm
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
440 fps
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Samsung WB750

Report a correction
Size Significantly smaller 105x59x24 mm vs 105x62x35 mm
Help
More than 30% smaller
3D Takes 3D photos Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Aperture Wider aperture f/3.2 vs f/3.5
Help
At its widest zoom, the WB750's lens captures marginally more light (0.3 f-stops)
High-speed framerate Higher speed movies 440 fps vs 240 fps
Help
More than 80% higher fps
Wide angle Better wide angle 24 mm vs 25 mm
Help
Almost the same
Image stabilization Better image stabilization Lens, Sensor shift vs Sensor shift
Help
Less risk of blur
Thickness Significantly thinner 1" vs 1.4"
Help
Around 30% thinner
Weight Lighter 193 g vs 214 g
Help
Around 10% lighter
Longest exposure Longer exposures 16s vs 1s
Help
16x longer exposures
Samsung WB750 Learn more about
the Samsung WB750

Advantages of the Nikon S9100

Report a correction
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen 921k dots vs 460k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Battery life Longer battery life 270 shots vs 220 shots
Help
More than 20% more shots per battery charge
Macro focus Better macro capability 4 cm vs 5 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 20% closer to the lens
Nikon Coolpix S9100 Learn more about
the Nikon S9100
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent travel zooms, and ignoring price

Samsung WB750 Samsung WB750 59

vs

58 Nikon Coolpix S9100 Nikon Coolpix S9100
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        similarities

        Compared to recent compacts

        Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
        Zoom Great zoom Help
        18x
        High-speed framerate Very high speed movies Help
        WB750:440 fps
        S9100:240 fps
        HDR In-camera HDR Help
        Combines multiple exposures
        Sensor type Better sensor types Help
        Better in low light
        Panorama In-camera panoramas Help
        Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
        Weight Heavy Help
        WB750:193 g
        S9100:214 g

        Compared to recent travel zooms

        Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

        Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

        Touch screen No touchscreens Help
        More buttons

        competitors

        Shared Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

        Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

        Travel zoom

        GPS Has a built-in GPS
        Longest exposure Slightly longer exposures
        Thickness Is thicker
        Weight Is slightly heavier

        Samsung WB750 Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Samsung WB250F

        Samsung WB250F

        Travel zoom

        $111 - $169

        Touch screen Has a touch screen
        Battery life Longer battery life
        High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
        3D Doesn't take 3D photos
        Samsung WB150F

        Samsung WB150F

        Travel zoom

        $104 - $129

        Size Slightly smaller
        Thickness Slightly thinner
        High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
        Movie format Lower resolution movies
        Samsung WB850F

        Samsung WB850F

        Travel zoom

        $397

        GPS Has a GPS
        Screen type Has an OLED screen
        High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
        Size Slightly larger
        Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR

        Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR

        Travel zoom

        $290

        GPS Has a GPS
        Supports RAW Shoots RAW
        Size Significantly larger
        3D Doesn't take 3D photos
        Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7

        Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7

        Travel zoom

        Size Smaller
        Aperture Slightly wider aperture
        Zoom Significantly less zoom
        High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

        Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Nikon Coolpix S8200

        Nikon Coolpix S8200

        Travel zoom

        $219

        Aperture Wider aperture
        Size Smaller
        Zoom Less zoom
        HDR Lacks in-camera HDR
        Nikon Coolpix S8100

        Nikon Coolpix S8100

        Travel zoom

        Size Smaller
        Image stabilization Better image stabilization
        Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
        Zoom Significantly less zoom
        Nikon Coolpix S9500

        Nikon Coolpix S9500

        Travel zoom

        $175

        GPS Has a GPS
        Screen type Has an OLED screen
        Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
        Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
        Nikon Coolpix S9300

        Nikon Coolpix S9300

        Travel zoom

        $224

        GPS Has a GPS
        3D Takes 3D photos
        High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
        Battery life Shorter battery life
        Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

        Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

        Travel zoom

        $199

        GPS Has a GPS
        Supports 24p Supports 24p
        Wide angle Worse wide angle
        Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

        appearance

        Samsung WB750 Nikon Coolpix S9100
        Samsung WB750 Nikon Coolpix S9100
        Samsung WB750 Nikon Coolpix S9100

        discussion

        Samsung WB750
        WB750
        Samsung

        Report a correction
        Nikon Coolpix S9100
        Coolpix S9100
        Nikon

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments