Updated (February 2011): Compare the Samsung WB700 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100 vs Samsung WB700

Winner
Nikon Coolpix S9100

49

Samsung WB700

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB700

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Size
Really small
Compact (99×59×22 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB700.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$998 body only

$1,148 with 16-50mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
True resolution Much higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$123 - $197

Size Significantly smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$249

Zoom Much more zoom
GPS Has a GPS
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Samsung WB700 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix A900

Nikon Coolpix A900

Travel zoom

$397

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom Much more zoom
Size Much larger
Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$200

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Travel zoom

$244

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
GPS Has a GPS
Size Significantly larger

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction
Samsung WB700
WB700
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments