Updated (February 2011): Compare the Samsung WB700 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100 vs Samsung WB700

Winner
Nikon Coolpix S9100

48

Samsung WB700

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB700

Size
Really small
Compact (99×59×22 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB700.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Fujifilm XP90

Fujifilm XP90

Waterproof

$124 - $179

Thickness Thinner
Waterproof Waterproof
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9300

Nikon Coolpix S9300

Travel zoom

$245

GPS Has a GPS
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Battery life Shorter battery life
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Travel zoom

$344

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Samsung WB700 Competitors

Samsung WB750

Samsung WB750

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger
Samsung WB500

Samsung WB500

Travel zoom

Size Much larger
Canon PowerShot IXUS 160

Canon PowerShot IXUS 160

Travel zoom

$101 - $158

Weight Much lighter
Size Smaller
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction
Samsung WB700
WB700
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments