Updated (February 2011): Compare the Samsung WB700 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100 vs Samsung WB700

Winner
Nikon Coolpix S9100

63

Samsung WB700

60

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
9.5 fps
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB700

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Size
Really small
Compact (99×59×22 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB700.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$219 - $297

Zoom Much more zoom
GPS Has a GPS
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$197

Size Significantly smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S8100

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Travel zoom

$360

Macro focus Significantly better macro capability
Size Smaller
Wide angle Much worse wide angle

Samsung WB700 Competitors

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$150

Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Macro focus Significantly worse macro capability
Samsung WB550

Samsung WB550

Travel zoom

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity (boost) Has boost ISO
Size Much larger
Samsung WB750

Samsung WB750

Travel zoom

$159

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
3D Takes 3D photos
Macro focus Significantly worse macro capability

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction
Samsung WB700
WB700
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments