Updated (February 2011): Compare the Samsung WB700 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100 vs Samsung WB700

Winner
Nikon Coolpix S9100

47

Samsung WB700

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Light-weight
Weight
214 g
Really small
Size
Compact (105×62×35 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB700

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Size
Really small
Compact (99×59×22 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB700.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$207 - $229

Size Smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S8100

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Travel zoom

$145

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Size Smaller
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$269

Size Significantly smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Samsung WB700 Competitors

Samsung WB750

Samsung WB750

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger
Samsung WB600

Samsung WB600

Travel zoom

Size Larger
Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$269

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Weight Lighter
Size Larger

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction
Samsung WB700
WB700
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments