Updated (February 2011): Compare the Samsung WB700 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100 vs Samsung WB700

Winner
Nikon Coolpix S9100

48

Samsung WB700

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Light-weight
Weight
214 g
Really small
Size
Compact (105×62×35 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB700

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Size
Really small
Compact (99×59×22 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB700.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$129 - $227

Size Significantly smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9300

Nikon Coolpix S9300

Travel zoom

$229

GPS Has a GPS
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L32

Nikon Coolpix L32

Compact

$80 - $117

Size Significantly smaller
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

Samsung WB700 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Pro digicam

$549

Aperture Much wider aperture
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Size Much larger
Samsung EX1

Samsung EX1

Pro digicam

Aperture Much wider aperture
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Size Significantly larger
Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F

Travel zoom

$143

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Significantly larger

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction
Samsung WB700
WB700
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments