Samsung WB250F vs Samsung WB750

Winner
Samsung WB250F

61
Samsung WB750

59

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB250F

Really small
Size
Compact (107×62×22 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB750

High-speed framerate
 High speed movies
440 fps
Weight
 Light-weight
193 g
Built-in flash
 Built-in flash
Usually standard
Movie format
 Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
More detailed differences and similarities →

galleries

Explore our gallery of 12 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB250F.
Explore our gallery of 6 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB750.

competitors

Samsung WB250F Competitors

Samsung ST150F

Samsung ST150F

Ultra compact

$130

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Smaller
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Compare the ST150F vs the WB250F
Sony Cyber-Shot HX60V

Sony Cyber-Shot HX60V

Travel zoom

$2,357

Wide angle Much better wide angle
GPS Has a GPS
Size Much larger
Compare the Cyber-Shot HX60V vs the WB250F
Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F

Travel zoom

$480

Aperture Wider aperture
Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Larger
Compare the WB350F vs the WB250F

Samsung WB750 Competitors

Samsung HZ30W

Samsung HZ30W

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Compare the HZ30W vs the WB750
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$1,097

Aperture Much wider aperture
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Zoom Less zoom
Compare the PowerShot S120 vs the WB750
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90

Compact

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Compare the Lumix DMC-FX90 vs the WB750
More detailed differences and similarities →

discussion

Samsung WB250F
WB250F
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung WB750
WB750
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

Mirek (6:41 PM, August 12, 2013)
You have done one mistake in starement- wide zoom aperture in wb250f is 5,8 not 58 so, wb250f has 73 points
 
More detailed differences and similarities →