Samsung WB350F vs Samsung WB200F

Winner
Samsung WB350F

58
Samsung WB200F

55

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB350F

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 30fps
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Really small
Size
Compact (114×65×25 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB200F

Size
 Really small
Compact (107×62×22 mm)
Thickness
 Thin
0.9"
Touch screen
 Touch screen
Fewer buttons
More detailed differences and similarities →

galleries

Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB350F.

competitors

Samsung WB350F Competitors

Samsung WB800F

Samsung WB800F

Travel zoom

Size Smaller
Thickness Thinner
Compare the WB800F vs the WB350F
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Travel zoom

$268 - $321

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Smaller
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Compare the Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 vs the WB350F
Samsung WB1100F

Samsung WB1100F

Super zoom

$320

Zoom Much more zoom
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Size Much larger
Compare the WB1100F vs the WB350F

Samsung WB200F Competitors

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$450

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Lowest price More expensive
Compare the WB250F vs the WB200F
Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$275

Weight Lighter
Thickness Slightly thicker
Compare the WB150F vs the WB200F
Fujifilm FinePix SL300

Fujifilm FinePix SL300

Super zoom

$257

Zoom Significantly more zoom
External flash Supports an external flash
Size Much larger
Compare the FinePix SL300 vs the WB200F
More detailed differences and similarities →

discussion

Samsung WB350F
WB350F
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung WB200F
WB200F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments

More detailed differences and similarities →