Samsung WB200F vs Samsung WB30F

Winner
Samsung WB200F

44

Samsung WB30F

39

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB200F

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Really small
Size
Compact (107×62×22 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB30F

Size
Really small
Ultra compact (98×58×17 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
Weight
Light-weight
128 g
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Samsung WB30F.

competitors

Samsung WB200F Competitors

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$250

Weight Lighter
Thickness Slightly thicker
Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$225

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$139 - $227

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Touch screen No touch screen

Samsung WB30F Competitors

Samsung WB35F

Samsung WB35F

Travel zoom

$209

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Screen size Much smaller screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3

Travel zoom

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Size Much larger
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$452 body only

$399 - $547 with 18-55mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Size Much larger

discussion

Samsung WB200F
WB200F
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung WB30F
WB30F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments