Samsung WB200F vs Samsung WB30F

Winner
Samsung WB200F

48

Samsung WB30F

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB200F

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Really small
Size
Compact (107×62×22 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB30F

Size
Really small
Ultra compact (98×58×17 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
Weight
Light-weight
128 g
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Samsung WB30F.

competitors

Samsung WB200F Competitors

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$269

Weight Lighter
Lowest price Cheaper
Thickness Slightly thicker
Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$289

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F

Travel zoom

$332

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Larger

Samsung WB30F Competitors

Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F

Travel zoom

$332

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Significantly larger
Samsung MV900F MultiView

Samsung MV900F MultiView

Compact

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Nikon Coolpix S3600

Nikon Coolpix S3600

Travel zoom

$119

Lowest price Cheaper
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Samsung WB200F
WB200F
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung WB30F
WB30F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments