Samsung WB200F vs Samsung WB30F

Winner
Samsung WB200F

59

Samsung WB30F

52

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB200F

Great zoom
Zoom
18x
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB30F

Size
Really small
Ultra compact (98×58×17 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
Weight
Light-weight
128 g
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Samsung WB30F.

competitors

Samsung WB200F Competitors

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$340

Weight Lighter
Thickness Slightly thicker
Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Travel zoom

$240

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX1

Compact

$700

Aperture Wider aperture
Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

Samsung WB30F Competitors

Samsung SH100

Samsung SH100

Ultra compact

$258

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F

Ultra compact

$428

Aperture Wider aperture
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Samsung DV300F

Samsung DV300F

Ultra compact

Aperture Wider aperture
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Wide angle Worse wide angle

discussion

Samsung WB200F
WB200F
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung WB30F
WB30F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments