Samsung WB200F

Winner
Samsung WB200F

62

vs

Samsung WB30F

54

Samsung WB30F

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB200F

Zoom
Great zoom
18x
Touch screen
Touch screen
Less buttons
Thickness
Thin
0.9"
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB30F

Size
Really small
Ultra compact 98x58x17 mm
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
Weight
Light-weight
128 g
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Samsung WB200F

Report a correction
Zoom More zoom 18x vs 10x
Help
More than 3x more zoom
Touch screen Has a touch screen Yes vs No
Help
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 460k dots vs 230k dots
Help
2x higher resolution screen
Longest exposure Longer exposures 16s vs 8s
Help
2x longer exposures
Samsung WB200F Learn more about
the Samsung WB200F

Advantages of the Samsung WB30F

Report a correction
Size Smaller 98x58x17 mm vs 107x62x22 mm
Help
More than 30% smaller
Weight Significantly lighter 128 g vs 226 g
Help
More than 40% lighter
Aperture Slightly wider aperture f/3.1 vs f/3.2
Help
At its widest zoom, the WB30F's lens captures marginally more light (0.1 f-stops)
Thickness Thinner 0.7" vs 0.9"
Help
More than 20% thinner
Samsung WB30F Learn more about
the Samsung WB30F
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent travel zooms, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Samsung WB200F Samsung WB200F 62
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        54 Samsung WB30F Samsung WB30F
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Panorama In-camera panoramas Help
              Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
              Thickness Thin Help
              WB200F:0.9"
              WB30F:0.7"
              Lowest price Inexpensive Help
              WB200F:$109.99
              WB30F:$119.95
              Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
              CCD
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Movie format Both shoot high resolution HD movies Help
              720p @ 30fps

              Compared to recent travel zooms

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Size Fairly small Help
              WB200F:107x62x22 mm
              WB30F:98x58x17 mm
              High-speed framerate No high speed movie support Help
              Not supported

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Samsung WB250F

              Samsung WB250F

              Travel zoom

              $110

              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is significantly heavier
              Samsung WB35F

              Samsung WB35F

              Travel zoom

              $91 - $99

              Thickness Is thicker
              Screen size Has a slightly smaller screen
              Samsung WB350F

              Samsung WB350F

              Travel zoom

              $140 - $253

              Zoom Has slightly more zoom
              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is significantly heavier
              Samsung WB150F

              Samsung WB150F

              Travel zoom

              $139 - $299

              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Travel zoom

              $134 - $158

              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Light sensitivity Much higher maximum light sensitivity
              Thickness Is thicker
              Screen size Has a slightly smaller screen
              Samsung WB50F

              Samsung WB50F

              Travel zoom

              $109 - $180

              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Nikon Coolpix S6500

              Nikon Coolpix S6500

              Travel zoom

              $117 - $220

              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
              Thickness Is thicker
              Size Is slightly larger

              Samsung WB200F Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              No significant competitors found that are specific to the Samsung WB200F.

              Samsung WB30F Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

              Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

              Ultra compact

              $78

              Size Smaller
              Lowest price Slightly cheaper
              Thickness Much thicker
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

              Travel zoom

              $98 - $108

              Weight Slightly lighter
              Lowest price Slightly cheaper
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Aperture Narrower aperture

              appearance

              Samsung WB200F Samsung WB30F
              Samsung WB200F Samsung WB30F
              Samsung WB200F Samsung WB30F

              discussion

              Samsung WB200F
              WB200F
              Samsung

              Report a correction
              Samsung WB30F
              WB30F
              Samsung

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments