Samsung WB200F vs Samsung WB30F

Winner
Samsung WB200F

61

Samsung WB30F

54

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB200F

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB30F

Size
Really small
Ultra compact (98×58×17 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
Weight
Light-weight
128 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Samsung WB30F.

competitors

Samsung WB200F Competitors

Olympus SZ-20

Olympus SZ-20

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Touch screen No touch screen
Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$280

Weight Lighter
Thickness Slightly thicker
Samsung WB750

Samsung WB750

Travel zoom

$473

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Touch screen No touch screen

Samsung WB30F Competitors

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F

Ultra compact

$150

Aperture Wider aperture
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Travel zoom

$319

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Sony DSC WX100

Sony DSC WX100

Travel zoom

$290

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

discussion

Samsung WB200F
WB200F
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung WB30F
WB30F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments