Samsung WB200F vs Samsung WB30F

Winner
Samsung WB200F

50

Samsung WB30F

44

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB200F

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Really small
Size
Compact (107×62×22 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB30F

Size
Really small
Ultra compact (98×58×17 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
Weight
Light-weight
128 g
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Samsung WB30F.

competitors

Samsung WB200F Competitors

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$209

Weight Lighter
Lowest price Cheaper
Thickness Slightly thicker
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1

Pro digicam

$435

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$289

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor

Samsung WB30F Competitors

Samsung NX3000

Samsung NX3000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$405 body only

$500 with 16-50mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Nikon Coolpix A10

Nikon Coolpix A10

Compact

$90

Lowest price Cheaper
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690

Travel zoom

$217

Longest exposure Significantly longer exposures
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Wide angle Worse wide angle

discussion

Samsung WB200F
WB200F
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung WB30F
WB30F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments