Nikon Coolpix S9100 vs Samsung WB150F

Tie
Nikon Coolpix S9100

45

Samsung WB150F

44

Tie

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB150F

Size
Really small
Compact (107×60×23 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 31 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB150F.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$160 - $227

Size Significantly smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$249

Zoom Significantly more zoom
GPS Has a GPS
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Ultra compact

$146

Size Much smaller
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Samsung WB150F Competitors

Samsung WB200F

Samsung WB200F

Travel zoom

$169

Thickness Slightly thinner
Weight Heavier
Samsung WB850F

Samsung WB850F

Travel zoom

$290

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
GPS Has a GPS
Size Larger
Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$210

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Weight Heavier

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction
Samsung WB150F
WB150F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments