Samsung WB200F vs Samsung WB100

Winner
Samsung WB200F

40

Samsung WB100

38

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB200F

Really small
Size
Compact (107×62×22 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
Light-weight
Weight
226 g
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB100

Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
10 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

competitors

Samsung WB200F Competitors

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$239

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Samsung WB800F

Samsung WB800F

Travel zoom

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Aperture Wider aperture
Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$275

Weight Slightly lighter

Samsung WB100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L320

Nikon Coolpix L320

Super zoom

$226

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Slightly smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots slower
Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$189

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810

Super zoom

$200

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Continuous shooting Shoots slower

discussion

Samsung WB200F
WB200F
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung WB100
WB100
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments