Samsung WB150F

Winner
Samsung WB150F

36

vs

Samsung ST200F

33

Samsung ST200F

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB150F

Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung ST200F

Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 
Differences | Recommendations | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Samsung ST200F

Report a correction
Aperture Slightly wider aperture f/3.1 vs f/3.2
Help
At its widest zoom, the ST200F's lens captures marginally more light (0.1 f-stops)
Samsung ST200F Learn more about
the Samsung ST200F

Advantages of the Samsung WB150F

Report a correction
Wide angle Better wide angle 24 mm vs 27 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Zoom Slightly more zoom 18x vs 10x
Help
More than 3x more zoom
Lowest price Slightly cheaper $150.48 vs $211.07
Help
The best price we've seen is $61 cheaper (around 30% less)
Samsung WB150F Learn more about
the Samsung WB150F
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent digicams, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Samsung ST200F Samsung ST200F 33
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        36 Samsung WB150F Samsung WB150F
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent digicams

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Panorama In-camera panoramas Help
              Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
              Viewfinder No viewfinders Help
              Can only preview photos on the screen
              Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
              CCD
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Movie format Both shoot high resolution HD movies Help
              720p @ 30fps

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Samsung WB250F

              Samsung WB250F

              Travel zoom

              $150

              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Samsung WB350F

              Samsung WB350F

              Travel zoom

              $140 - $167

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Samsung WB200F

              Samsung WB200F

              Travel zoom

              $140 - $150

              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Samsung WB30F

              Samsung WB30F

              Ultra compact

              $120

              Screen resolution Has a slightly lower resolution screen
              Samsung DV300F

              Samsung DV300F

              Ultra compact

              $280

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              3D Captures 3D images
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Samsung WB35F

              Samsung WB35F

              Travel zoom

              $90 - $99

              Screen size Has a slightly smaller screen
              Screen resolution Has a slightly lower resolution screen
              Samsung DV150F

              Samsung DV150F

              Ultra compact

              $110 - $200

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              3D Captures 3D images
              Macro focus Significantly worse macro focusing
              Image stabilization Has worse image stabilization

              Samsung ST200F Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Samsung ST150F

              Samsung ST150F

              Ultra compact

              $116

              Aperture Wider aperture
              Wide angle Better wide angle
              Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
              Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Travel zoom

              $99 - $182

              Wide angle Better wide angle
              Aperture Slightly wider aperture
              Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS

              Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS

              Super zoom

              $215

              Aperture Wider aperture
              Image stabilization No image stabilization
              Wide angle Much worse wide angle
              Nikon Coolpix S9500

              Nikon Coolpix S9500

              Travel zoom

              $221

              Screen type Has an OLED screen
              3D Takes 3D photos
              Aperture Narrower aperture

              Samsung WB150F Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

              Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

              Travel zoom

              $150 - $225

              Macro focus Significantly better macro capability
              Wide angle Worse wide angle
              Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

              Travel zoom

              $300 - $310

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
              Aperture Slightly narrower aperture

              appearance

              Samsung ST200F Samsung WB150F
              Samsung ST200F Samsung WB150F
              Samsung ST200F Samsung WB150F

              discussion

              Samsung ST200F
              ST200F
              Samsung

              Report a correction
              Samsung WB150F
              WB150F
              Samsung

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments