Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs Samsung NX300

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

89

Samsung NX300

51

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX300

Screen size
Large screen
3.3"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
1200 ms startup delay

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX300.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$396 - $400

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Startup delay Significantly less startup delay
Color depth Worse color depth
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Pro digicam

$598

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Weight Slightly heavier

Samsung NX300 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $498 body only

$578 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,298 body only

$1,446 - $1,746 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Focus points Many more focus points
Screen size Much smaller screen
Samsung NX500

Samsung NX500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,399 with 16-50mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Overall image quality Better image quality
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
Cybershot DSC-RX100
Sony

Report a correction
Samsung NX300
NX300
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments