Samsung NX210 vs Samsung NX3000

Samsung NX210
Samsung NX3000

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX210

24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
OLED Screen
Screen type
Bright and vivid
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Really small
Size
Mid size (117×63×37 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX3000

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Size
Really small
Mid size (117×66×39 mm)
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX3000.

competitors

Samsung NX210 Competitors

Samsung NX500

Samsung NX500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,495 with 16-50mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$772 body only

$730 with 20-50mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Samsung NX1100

Samsung NX1100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$478 with 20-50mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Weight Lighter
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

Samsung NX3000 Competitors

Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX2000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$485 with 20-50mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Samsung NX500

Samsung NX500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,495 with 16-50mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Lowest price More expensive
Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$772 body only

$730 with 20-50mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Startup delay Much less startup delay
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Samsung NX210
NX210
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung NX3000
NX3000
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments