Sony Alpha A5100 vs Samsung NX2000

Winner
Sony Alpha A5100

100

Samsung NX2000

92

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A5100

High true resolution
True resolution
24.7 MP
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Phase detection autofocus
Badge
fast and accurate
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX2000

Screen size
Large screen
3.7"
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,152k dots
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX2000.

competitors

Sony Alpha A5100 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$442 - $498 body only

$598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$435 - $448 with 16-50mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $580 with 15-45mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Battery life Much shorter battery life

Samsung NX2000 Competitors

Samsung NX3000

Samsung NX3000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$446 body only

$500 with 20-50mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Longer battery life
Screen size Much smaller screen
Samsung NX1000

Samsung NX1000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$430 with 20-50mm lens

Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$425 - $448

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Slightly higher resolution screen
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Sony Alpha A5100
Alpha A5100
Sony

Report a correction
Samsung NX2000
NX2000
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments