Updated (April 2012): Compare the Samsung NX1000 vs Sony Alpha NEX-5

Samsung NX1000 vs Sony Alpha NEX-5

Tie
Samsung NX1000

99

Sony Alpha NEX-5

99

Tie

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX1000

Thin
Thickness
1.5"
Light-weight
Weight
222 g
Really small
Size
Mid size (114×63×37 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha NEX-5

Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
1000 ms startup delay
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Size
Really small
Compact (111×59×38 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.5"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX1000.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Alpha NEX-5.

competitors

Samsung NX1000 Competitors

Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$772 body only

$730 with 20-50mm lens

Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX2000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$578 with 20-50mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Samsung NX3000

Samsung NX3000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$446 body only

$500 with 20-50mm lens

Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Startup delay Much more startup delay

Sony Alpha NEX-5 Competitors

Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$405 body only

$367 - $497 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Lens availability Much more lenses available
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$435 with 16-50mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$399 body only

$499 - $500 with 18-55mm lens

Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Much larger

discussion

Samsung NX1000
NX1000
Samsung

Report a correction
Sony Alpha NEX-5
Alpha NEX-5
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments