Updated (April 2012): Compare the Samsung NX1000 vs Samsung NX210

Samsung NX1000 vs Samsung NX210

Winner
Samsung NX1000

92

Samsung NX210

88

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX1000

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
Light-weight
Weight
222 g
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX210

Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
Weight
Light-weight
222 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX1000.

competitors

Samsung NX1000 Competitors

Samsung NX100

Samsung NX100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$301 body only

$487 with 20-55mm lens

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Startup delay Less startup delay
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Samsung Galaxy Camera

Samsung Galaxy Camera

Travel zoom

$450

Screen size Much larger screen
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Lens availability Significantly fewer lenses available

Samsung NX210 Competitors

Canon PowerShot A470

Canon PowerShot A470

Compact

$105

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Lowest price Cheaper
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Pro digicam

$750

Image stabilization Image stabilization
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Samsung NX1000
NX1000
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung NX210
NX210
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments