Samsung NX1 vs Samsung NX500

Tie
Samsung NX1

100

Samsung NX500

100

Tie

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX1

Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.68x
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX500

Badge
Phase detection autofocus
fast and accurate
Size
Really small
Mid size (120×64×43 mm)
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX1.

competitors

Samsung NX1 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Sony A7S

Sony A7S

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,998 body only

$2,598 with 28-70mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Lens availability Significantly more lenses available
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$695 - $698 with 12-60mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Lens availability Significantly more lenses available
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

Samsung NX500 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Pro digicam

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Longest exposure Significantly longer exposures
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$498 with 16-50mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Lens availability Slightly more lenses available
Movie format Lower resolution movies

discussion

Samsung NX1
NX1
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung NX500
NX500
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments