Samsung EX2F vs Samsung NX2000

Winner
Samsung EX2F

53

Samsung NX2000

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung EX2F

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.4
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Digital
  2. Lens
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX2000

Overall image quality
Great image quality
75.0
Screen size
Large screen
3.7"
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,152k dots
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons

galleries

Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Samsung EX2F.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX2000.

competitors

Samsung EX2F Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P7700

Nikon Coolpix P7700

Pro digicam

$700

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Color depth Better color depth
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Pro digicam

$392

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Overall image quality Much worse image quality
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$397 - $448

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Color depth Better color depth
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

Samsung NX2000 Competitors

Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$398 body only

$448 with 16-50mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$300 body only

$367 - $379 with 16-50mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen size Much smaller screen
Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$772 body only

$500 with 18-55mm lens

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Samsung EX2F
EX2F
Samsung

Report a correction
Samsung NX2000
NX2000
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments