Sony Alpha NEX-6 vs Pentax Q7

Sony Alpha NEX-6
Pentax Q7

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha NEX-6

Great image quality
Overall image quality
78.0
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.71x
 

Reasons to buy the Pentax Q7

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Badge
Built-in focus motor
Autofocuses with more lenses
Size
Really small
Compact (102×58×34 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.3"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Pentax Q7.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Alpha NEX-6.

competitors

Sony Alpha NEX-6 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $548 body only

$547 - $648 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
Viewfinder size Slightly smaller viewfinder
Sony NEX-7

Sony NEX 7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$496 body only

$802 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Focus points Fewer focus points
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$447 body only

$365 - $379 with 16-50mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Battery life Longer battery life
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

Pentax Q7 Competitors

Pentax K-01

Pentax K-01

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$389 body only

$509 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Pentax MX-1

Pentax MX-1

Pro digicam

$522

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Pentax Q10

Pentax Q10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$190 body only

$397 with 5-83mm lens

Battery life Longer battery life
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Sony Alpha NEX-6
Alpha NEX-6
Sony

Report a correction
Pentax Q7
Q7
Pentax

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments