Sony Alpha NEX-6 vs Pentax Q7

Sony Alpha NEX-6
Pentax Q7

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha NEX-6

Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.71x
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
257 ms shutter lag
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
 

Reasons to buy the Pentax Q7

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Badge
Built-in focus motor
Autofocuses with more lenses
Size
Really small
Compact (102×58×34 mm)
Weight
Light-weight
200 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Pentax Q7.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Alpha NEX-6.

competitors

Sony Alpha NEX-6 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$447 - $448 body only

$529 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Viewfinder size Slightly smaller viewfinder
Sony Alpha a99 II

Sony Alpha a99 II

Boutique

$3,198

Image stabilization Image stabilization
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Sony NEX-7

Sony NEX 7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$456 body only

Startup delay Much less startup delay
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity

Pentax Q7 Competitors

Pentax Q10

Pentax Q10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$190 body only

Battery life Longer battery life
Supports 24p No 24p support
Olympus OM-D E-M5

Olympus OM-D E-M5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$520 - $799 body only

$629 with 14-42mm lens

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Movie continuous focus Continuous video focus
Built-in focus motor Doesn't have a built-in focus motor
Pentax K-1

Pentax K-1

Pro DSLR

$1,804 - $1,897 body only

$2,297 with 28-105mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Much longer battery life
Size Much larger

discussion

Sony Alpha NEX-6
Alpha NEX-6
Sony

Report a correction
Pentax Q7
Q7
Pentax

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments