Pentax K-50 vs Pentax K-500

Tie
Pentax K-50

87

Pentax K-500

87

Tie

Reasons to buy the Pentax K-50

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Thin
Thickness
2.8"
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
High ISO
Light sensitivity
51,600 ISO
 

Reasons to buy the Pentax K-500

Battery life
Great battery life
710 shots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Light sensitivity
High ISO
51,600 ISO
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Pentaprism

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Pentax K-50.
Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Pentax K-500.

competitors

Pentax K-50 Competitors

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$329 body only

$399 - $547 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Pentax K-S2

Pentax K-S2

Entry-level DSLR

$499 body only

$526 - $532 with 18-50mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
Continuous shooting Shoots slower
Pentax K-3 II

Pentax K-3 II

Entry-level DSLR

$850 body only

$1,338 with 18-135mm lens

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Larger

Pentax K-500 Competitors

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$329 body only

$399 - $547 with 18-55mm lens

Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon D5500

Nikon D5500

Entry-level DSLR

$565 - $797 body only

$590 - $897 with 18-55mm lens

Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Pentax K-S1

Pentax K-S1

Entry-level DSLR

$329 - $430 body only

$400 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
GPS Has a GPS
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Pentax K-50
K-50
Pentax

Report a correction
Pentax K-500
K-500
Pentax

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments