Updated (July 2010): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

68

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

49

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Great battery life
Battery life
400 shots
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Pro digicam

$521

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Battery life Shorter battery life
Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$470

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$450

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Battery life Much shorter battery life

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Aperture Slightly narrower aperture
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$276 - $279

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
GPS No built-in GPS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10

Travel zoom

$360

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Lumix DMC-LX5
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7
Lumix DMC-ZS7
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments