Sony NEX 7 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2

Winner
Sony NEX-7

100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2

66

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony NEX 7

High true resolution
True resolution
24 MP
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
10 fps
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
Really small
Size
Compact (111×59×38 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony NEX-7.

competitors

Sony NEX-7 Competitors

Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,000 body only

$1,700 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Supports 24p No 24p support
Olympus OM-D E-M10

Olympus OM-D E-M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$385 - $549 body only

$440 - $599 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Sony Alpha NEX-5

Sony Alpha NEX-5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Weight Lighter
Supports 24p No 24p support

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$699 body only

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Size Significantly smaller
Thickness Much thinner
Startup delay Much more startup delay
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$472 - $500 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Touch screen No touch screen

discussion

Sony NEX-7
NEX 7
Sony

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2
Lumix DMC-GH2
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments