Sony SLT A65 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2

Winner
Sony SLT-A65

65

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2

49

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A65

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
Phase detection autofocus
Badge
fast and accurate
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT-A65.

competitors

Sony SLT-A65 Competitors

Sony SLT-A68

Sony SLT-A68

Boutique

Focus points More focus points
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Sony SLT A58

Sony SLT A58

Entry-level DSLR

$632 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Longer battery life
Startup delay Less startup delay
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Sony SLT A37

Sony SLT A37

Entry-level DSLR

$522 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Significantly less startup delay
Size Slightly smaller
Screen size Much smaller screen

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5

Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,998 body only

$1,997 - $2,598 with 12-60mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$660 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Olympus OM-D E-M10

Olympus OM-D E-M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$499 - $549 body only

$549 - $648 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Sony SLT-A65
SLT A65
Sony

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2
Lumix DMC-GH2
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments