Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

Great battery life
Battery life
470 shots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$279

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$470

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Zoom Much more zoom
Size Significantly larger

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L330

Nikon Coolpix L330

Super zoom

$218

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Size Much smaller
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$402 body only

$397 with 18-55mm lens

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Battery life Much longer battery life
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Super zoom

$900

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
Lumix DMC-FZ35
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50
Lumix DMC-FZ50
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments