Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

42

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700

35

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
2300 ms startup delay
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
310 ms shutter lag
Great battery life
Battery life
400 shots
Great macro
Macro focus
1.0 cm
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Pro digicam

$279 - $380

3D Takes 3D photos
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Startup delay Much more startup delay
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Pro digicam

$272

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Size Slightly smaller
Shutter lag Much more shutter lag
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$599 - $698

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Sensor size Much larger sensor
Built-in flash No built-in flash

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$349

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,053 - $1,298 body only

$1,700 - $2,737 with 35-100mm lens

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Ultra compact

$80

Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Lumix DMC-LX5
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700
Lumix DMC-FX700
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments