Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX66 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX66

100
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3

86

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX66

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
25 mm
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
Light-weight
Weight
145 g
Really small
Size
Super compact (97×54×22 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3

Size
 Really small
Super compact (95×53×23 mm)
Image stabilization
 Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Thickness
 Thin
0.9"
Fastest shutter speed
 Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second
More detailed differences and similarities →

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX66 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95

Pro digicam

$315

Aperture Wider aperture
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Compare the PowerShot S95 vs the Lumix DMC-FX66
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2

Compact

Thickness Thinner
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Compare the Lumix DMC-FP2 vs the Lumix DMC-FX66
Placeholder

Sanyo DSC-AZ1

Digicam

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Sensor size Larger sensor
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Compare the DSC-AZ1 vs the Lumix DMC-FX66

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3 Competitors

Leica C-LUX 2

Leica C-LUX 2

Compact

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Thickness Slightly thinner
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures
Compare the C-LUX 2 vs the Lumix DMC-FS3
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Travel zoom

$399

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Significantly larger
Compare the PowerShot SX230 HS vs the Lumix DMC-FS3
Placeholder

Olympus D-400 Zoom

Digicam

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Size Much larger
Compare the D-400 Zoom vs the Lumix DMC-FS3
More detailed differences and similarities →

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX66
Lumix DMC-FX66
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3
Lumix DMC-FS3
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments

More detailed differences and similarities →