Updated (June 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 vs Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

48

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
High true resolution
True resolution
20 MP
Really small
Size
Compact (102×58×36 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Size
Really small
Compact (105×59×28 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Thickness
Thin
1.1"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 32 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$379

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Smaller
Battery life Significantly shorter battery life
Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Travel zoom

$316

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Zoom Much more zoom
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$300

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix ZS35

Panasonic Lumix ZS35

Travel zoom

$300

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Lowest price Cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Travel zoom

$350

Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Size Larger

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
Cybershot DSC-RX100
Sony

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
Lumix ZS20
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments