Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

51

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Great battery life
Battery life
400 shots
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS20

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel

galleries

Explore our gallery of 32 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Pro digicam

$534

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Battery life Shorter battery life
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1

Pro digicam

$9,357

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Lowest price Much more expensive
Canon EOS Rebel T1i

Canon Rebel T1i

Entry-level DSLR

$500 body only

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Travel zoom

$350

Longest exposure Significantly longer exposures
Fastest shutter speed Significantly faster max shutter speed
Zoom Slightly less zoom
Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Travel zoom

$336

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Battery life Longer battery life
Panasonic Lumix ZS19

Panasonic Lumix ZS19

Travel zoom

$1,497

GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Lumix DMC-LX5
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
Lumix ZS20
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments