Updated (January 2011): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

44

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Size
Really small
Compact (102×58×29 mm)
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Thickness
Thin
1.1"
Weight
Light-weight
200 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$298 - $329

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Travel zoom

$220

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$428

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Travel zoom

$268

Zoom More zoom
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

Ultra compact

$88 - $110

Size Much smaller
Aperture Wider aperture
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
Lumix DMC-ZS10
Panasonic

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v
Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments