Updated (January 2011): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

51

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Size
Really small
Compact (102×58×29 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.1"
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$249 - $333

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Travel zoom

$550

Zoom More zoom
Size Smaller
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v Competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Travel zoom

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Larger
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7v

Travel zoom

$559

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
True resolution Slightly higher true resolution
Lowest price Significantly more expensive
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3

Travel zoom

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
Lumix DMC-ZS10
Panasonic

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v
Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments