Updated (January 2011): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

55

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

49

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Size
Really small
Compact (102×58×29 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.1"
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15

Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Travel zoom

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Travel zoom

$179 - $210

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Travel zoom

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3

Travel zoom

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55

Travel zoom

$299

True resolution Slightly higher true resolution
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
Lumix DMC-ZS10
Panasonic

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v
Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments