Samsung WB850F vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Winner
Samsung WB850F

49

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB850F

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
23 mm
Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.8
Really small
Size
Compact (110×62×25 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
480 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10.
Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Samsung WB850F.

competitors

Samsung WB850F Competitors

Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F

Travel zoom

$187

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weight Lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Travel zoom

$228 - $299

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$120 - $177

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Weight Significantly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom Much more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Travel zoom

$159

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Samsung WB850F
WB850F
Samsung

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
Lumix DMC-ZS10
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments