Updated (September 2011): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Samsung WB750

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Samsung WB750

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

70

Samsung WB750

62

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB750

Size
Really small
Compact (105×59×25 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
440 fps
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Thickness
Thin
1"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10.
Explore our gallery of 6 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB750.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$298 - $309

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Travel zoom

$234

Lowest price Significantly cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Samsung WB750 Competitors

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$150

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Travel zoom

$265 - $279

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530

Super zoom

$277

Zoom Much more zoom
Macro focus Much better macro capability
Size Much larger

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
Lumix DMC-ZS10
Panasonic

Report a correction
Samsung WB750
WB750
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments