Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

Panasonic Lumix ZS20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

95

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Really small
Size
Compact (105×59×28 mm)
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
Light-weight
Weight
206 g
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10.
Explore our gallery of 32 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Much larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$469

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$315

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
GPS No built-in GPS

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$849 - $1,347 body only

$1,174 with 14-42mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Size Much larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15

Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Travel zoom

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Weight Slightly lighter
GPS No built-in GPS
Fujifilm XF1

Fujifilm XF1

Pro digicam

$699

Aperture Much wider aperture
Sensor size Larger sensor
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
Lumix ZS20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
Lumix DMC-ZS10
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments