Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

Panasonic Lumix ZS20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

65

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

62

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10.
Explore our gallery of 32 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$348

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Travel zoom

$270

Lowest price Cheaper
Longest exposure Longer exposures
GPS No built-in GPS
Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Travel zoom

$344

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 Competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Travel zoom

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10

Travel zoom

$386

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$149

Size Smaller
Zoom More zoom
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
Lumix ZS20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
Lumix DMC-ZS10
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments