Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10 vs Panasonic Lumix TZ25

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10

100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25

92

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
25 mm
Large screen
Screen size
3"
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix TZ25

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 60fps
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$546 - $649

Aperture Much wider aperture
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT4

Panasonic Lumix FT4

Waterproof

$282

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Smaller
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Travel zoom

GPS Has a GPS
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220

Travel zoom

$198

Size Much smaller
Thickness Significantly thinner
Zoom Less zoom

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10
Lumix DMC-TZ10
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25
Lumix TZ25
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments